this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
258 points (95.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
726 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello just making a poll, which one do you prefer? personally I prefer x265 but since the rarbg falldown i've seen that almost all 1080p rips are in x264, what do you think about that, and do you recommend any place to find more x265 content beside those in the megathread?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Confetti_Camouflage@pawb.social 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unless you're specifically grabbing those high bitrate archival copies you really shouldn't be re-encoding from one lossy codec to another lossy codec.

[–] Deathcrow@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

transcoding is certianly not ideal, but some releases have obscenely high bitrates and if you're more concerned about archival than max fidelity reducing size by a factor of 5-10x (h264->av1) is worth it for me.

[–] Madiator2011@lm.madiator.cloud 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's hard to get to know if encode is good encode :)

Are you getting the highest bitrate release you can before re-encoding? You can only make the quality worse by re-encoding. It's just the way lossy compression works.