this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
108 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

58070 readers
2799 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago (33 children)

Just think about it for a moment. Apple made a mask, that when you wear it in your face, projects a 3D animated avatar if you face on the outside. That is so weird, f’ed up and dystopian.

[–] nikt@lemmy.ca 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (15 children)

I won’t argue about whether this is dystopian, but the practical reason for the face projection is that they wanted to make this not just something you wear sitting alone in your basement, like most other VR headsets. They wanted it to be usable around other people, at a workplace, with family, etc.

Interacting with someone wearing a full face blind is just weird, so they thought that making the eyes visible would help make this a bit more socially usable.

I’m not sure that’s really going to work out — seems at least as awkward as Google’s failed Glass project — but Apple’s design decision has some merit.

[–] Spur4383@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's a VR headset. It's not a social experience.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

But that's what Apple is trying to change. They don't call it a VR headset. They don't even use the phrase "virtual reality" because they don't want people thinking of it as a VR headset.

Their goal is to get people used to wearing a headset to do normal "real" world things. They want it to be AR, not VR. It's like getting people used to a touchscreen, or not having a headphone jack, or a big-ass notch in the screen.

Their long-term goal is likely glasses that can do the same things as this headset, but with transparent screens, so that they don't need the outer display. And then it won't be VR-first, it'll be AR-first.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago

Their long-term goal is likely glasses that can do the same things as this headset, but with transparent screens, so that they don't need the outer display.

All I want is a pair of glasses that can display notifications like a smart watch. We have had the tech to do this for years and it upsets me that it doesn't exist yet.

Hell, Google even calls it WearOS... pretty sure you wear glasses.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Not gonna happen for a long time

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Way to ignore the entire comment and show that you don't understand VR in the slightest, all in one sentence.

Ever heard of Taklings House Party? I've also spent many a night throwing back a few beers and taking turns in Beat Saber.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)