this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
-34 points (17.3% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2638 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did you even read the article?

A recent New York Times and Sienna College poll found that in six key swing states 71% of black voters would back Mr Biden in 2024, a steep drop from the 92% nationally that helped him win the White House at the last election. These are votes the president cannot afford to lose.

Ronnie Bennett, co-owner of the Broughton Street Cafe in Orangeburg County, told the BBC: "If Biden has put money into black communities, I don't see it."

Ms Bennett plans to vote for Joe Biden again but mostly out of obligation, feeling Democrats offer her the most hope. "Our ancestors fought for the right to vote, so we exercise that right whether we like who's running or not," she says.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I did not. I did read a few of the articles you posted some time ago carrying some kind of negative-to-Biden message. At this point it feels like the repetition of one single, easy-to-remember message is an attempt to manipulate your audience, for whatever reason, and not an honest attempt to communicate the truth about what's going on in the world. That more than anything is why I didn't read it. I did read a few of the first "Biden is in trouble because X voters aren't planning to vote for him" stories much like this one that you posted.

I just looked over the first page of your profile, and 36% of the stories you posted are explicitly negative about Democrats in some way. There's one with Nancy Pelosi kneeling in traditional African dress, which was an absolutely heinous thing for her to do I agree, but it was also like 5 years ago. There's a meme about the Democrats bombing the shit out of the middle east, also from at least 4-5 years ago. There's a pretty constant stream of "this is why Biden is in trouble" stories. I feel like it's a notable enough pattern to comment on it. Is that alright with you?

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're free to comment however you'd like. It's good to discuss. Should I only post Pro-Biden articles and turn this into an echo chamber like Reddit's politics sub? I'm not sure what you want from me.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You are, as well, free to post whatever you like.

I don't feel that the lemmy.world hivemind is overly enthusiastic about establishment Democrats. Like I said, my own negative reaction comes a lot more from the perception that it's some kind of deliberately slanted attempt at influence, with a third of your feed being anti-Democrat in some way and digging up memes from years ago to help make the point. Has nothing to do with me not liking your viewpoint or saying you can't post something against Biden. But there's a big difference between posting "Yo I think Biden like every other US president is a war criminal enabler," versus posting 2-3 stories a day about how he's behind among Latinos in Nevada, or remember when Nancy Pelosi did a stupid thing.

Let me ask this, what's your preferred outcome in the presidential election this year?

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We already all know the GOP and Trump are awful and others post the anti-Trump articles in greater numbers than my posts. No use in me adding to those.

Let me ask this, what’s your preferred outcome in the presidential election this year?

Full disclosure, I'm not a Democrat or Republican. I'm registered No Party Preference in California. My views are actually Left (not what they consider Democrats to be) to Far Left. I hate our two-party system and having to always vote for the lesser of two evils. My preferred outcome, honestly, would be for Biden to be replaced by a real progressive but that won't happen. I would hope, begrudgingly, that Biden wins but it's not looking good in multiple demographics. Running on "but Trump" worked in 2020 but I don't think it's going to work as well as it did for 2024.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

My views are actually Left (not what they consider Democrats to be) to Far Left. I hate our two-party system and having to always vote for the lesser of two evils. My preferred outcome, honestly, would be for Biden to be replaced by a real progressive but that won't happen.

This, I all 1,000% agree with, and I think I'm pretty much on the same page as you. I'm just having trouble seeing how posting memes about "Democrats bad" and a constant stream of Biden vs. Trump stories ties in with that. If you were talking up more lefty Democrats or posting news about specific critiques of Biden that would be fine.

Think of it like if there was an actually-leftist candidate in the race, and you were looking at someone who posted several times a day about how he was polling behind Biden and critiques of stuff he did from 5 years ago. But then they said, oh yeah I'm a leftist, I'm just posting news dude, I just think he's not looking good. That'd be irritating. Right?

Running on "but Trump" worked in 2020 but I don't think it's going to work as well as it did for 2024.

This is a fuckin' bonkers thing to say. There's a for-real fascist in the race with a for-real chance of winning. The house is on fire. And you're running around saying how one of the firefighters is problematic. Okay, yeah, maybe. We still need to put out the fire.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you were talking up more lefty Democrats

Which Democrats are actually Leftist and not just centrist or Republican-lite? Bernie? AOC? We tried and the Dem party/oligarchy shut that down real quick.

Trump and the GOP is the enemy. Biden and the Democrats, to me, are also the enemy to the people because they want the status quo to continue. "Nothing will fundamentally change." I feel we're going to get fascism either way. One is accelerated and the other is a slow death march.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I feel we're going to get fascism either way.

Therrre it is

You only think that because you haven't actually lived under fascism.

"Nothing will fundamentally change."

I hope like hell Trump doesn't win, and have a chance to prove to you how absolutely utterly mistaken you are in this.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago