this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
79 points (92.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5183 readers
566 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So why are 12 climate organizations across the nation — including Third Act, the climate action group for people over 60 that I helped found — suddenly turning their attention to Costco and asking it to change its ways? Well, as is sometimes the case with basically good people, Costco has gone a little astray by hanging around with the wrong crowd.

In this case, the wrong crowd is Citi. The New York bank provides the credit cards used by Costco shoppers — and it uses the money it makes, in part, to expand the world’s fossil fuel industry, the one thing scientists tell us we must stop doing.

Archived copies of the article: web.archive.org archive.today ghostarchive.org

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thebuoyancyofcitrus@beehaw.org -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This might seem petty by comparison but I feel like Costco is one of the worst for having wildly oversized packaging with so much wasted material. It hurts a little every time I buy something from them these days. I don't know that I've seen much about it but the additional energy to produce and transport small goods with oversized packaging has to add up, no?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Bigger containers = less package per unit volume. If your household is going to consume the full amount, the larger containers reduce waste.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A lot of times they have big packages containing small packages, though. Sure, you get a bulk size of mac n cheese or ramen or something... but they have individual packaging. So now you not only have to deal with the individual package waste, but also the big packaging too.

Not to mention clamshells that have manufacturer sub-packaging on single items.

[–] thebuoyancyofcitrus@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I was thinking of some of the home goods like knives or silverware. I bought a beard trimmer that could have come in a nice slim box and instead I got enough cardboard and empty space to hold 4 more. For me that has become the norm at Costco and I feel gross every time for participating.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

Not to mention lower price which is.... the point.