politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
That's the only reason the RNC hasn't already formally thrown Trump their undivided support like they did in 2020, which had the effect of canceling GOP primaries, IMO.
The RNC is being forced to wait, literally, for the courts to decide multiple issues or they'd have called for Trump already, just like they did in 2020 -- which Haley is strangely refraining from mentioning these days, as though it never happened.
I think it's safe to assert that if the RNC had even a scrap of a guarantee that Trump will survive his multiple legal consequences this year, they absolutely already would have declared for Trump, and Haley would be just as screwed today as Bill Weld, Mark Sanford, and Joe Walsh were four years ago.
Funny how she keeps forgetting that. I guess it was okay when it was other GOP presidential candidates getting fucked by their own party.
They threw their support behind him in 2020 because he was the incumbent. Same as the DNC did with Biden this time.
It may seem that way, but it's a bit more complex than that, and it is neither automatic nor guaranteed unless no one else of the same party runs against the incumbent.
The national conventions make a new call every time on who to support, both RNC and DNC: not at the same point in the primary schedule, but instead whenever they think they have their winner. Some years that doesn't happen prior to the National Convention itself, and the candidate is actually declared at the convention instead of beforehand via the primaries. These days it's usually the primaries, but it can still go all the way to being decided at the convention. If the party throws support to a single candidate very early, as they did in 2020, it has the effect of ending the campaigns of everyone else in that party for that presidential election.
In 2020 there were several viable GOP non-Trump candidates running for the GOP presidential ticket, and that's exactly where Nikki Haley is now. She's not an also-ran; she actually has a sizeable fraction of the primary votes so far, though it is still just that: a fraction.
But Nikki Haley is terrified that's exactly what the RNC is going to do to her, call it for Trump before Super Tuesday on March 5. That would not end her campaign in itself, but several state caucuses would simply not hold primaries for that election (why spend the money if the winner is already chosen?) so all those states automatically go to whoever the national convention supports, and there's no way for a candidate to win against all that. That's what happened in 2020.
The problem isn't her viability as much as it is the split down the party itself, and she's right to be terrified. But she's also a fucking hypocrite for it, because she had nothing to say in 2020 when the RNC did it to others in her own position now.
The RNC does not think it has its winner yet, but NOT because Nikki Haley presents any threat to Trump. It's because Trump presents a threat to Trump that they can't give him the GOP ticket yet.
TL;DR: For all intents and purposes, as far as the RNC is concerned, Trump IS running as an incumbent, but they can't call it for him because of his legal issues. If he gets thrown off the ballot or into jail, what do they do for a candidate then?