this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
354 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3931 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google executives acknowledged this month they need to do a better job surfacing user-generated content after the recent Reddit blackouts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I liked them well enough, but recently is it just me or it seems like every time I reload a search by simply going back to the page, the ranking of the results immediately changes?
That is supper annoying to me, as now I can't keep track of the results I opened easily

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This happens sometimes if you search for a new non-cached search phrase. It'll give you a couple pages, then update it's index and when you go back you're on the updated index.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting, but how come it never did that before? Did I just not notice?

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't know. I've noticed it happening for the last few months. Maybe they have the ability to update caches faster now and want to give the most fresh results. It can be irritating if you're like me and like to click a result and then go back and open a bunch of results in new tabs.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds plausible yeah, so I haven't gone crazy haha, it really is annoying since usually the new results are also worse than the first batch in my experience. Guess I'll just pick up the habit of opening everything in a new tab from the get go

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the new results are also worse than the first batch in my experience.

FWIW I thought the same. Seems like every search engine turns to doo with time.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would be a great moment for a great open source search engine to take everyone by storm, well, like that's ever gonna happen...

[–] ArcticCircleSystem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like that would be more easily gameable. SearXNG relies on results from other engines and there's this one distributed one that's apparently basically useless for most searches. Do with that info what you will. ~Nai

[–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My wish would be for a free search engine, not a meta search engine, but it doesn't seem like there is much interest for that, mainly because it highly demanding in terms of complexity, but most importantly resources to run it.

I feel like that would be more easily gameable.

I'm sorry, what does that mean?

[–] ArcticCircleSystem@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the algorithm is made open source, it'll likely be even easier for spammers to exploit it to spam SEO crap. ~Nai

[–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I kind of doubt that they would optimize for an underdog in the search engine space, they'd be spending money on something fundamentally unprofitable, also because there's going to be a high overlap between the users of such an engine and those who would use an ad/content blocker