this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
297 points (97.4% liked)

World News

32316 readers
1277 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Genocide is genocide.

Harm reduction arguments only work to a point. If genocide is still the outcome, then it isn't really harm reduction.

[–] explodicle@local106.com -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If we're here now, then the harm reduction arguments worked while the plan didn't.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@local106.com 6 points 9 months ago

We are now in a scenario where we'll settle for a genocidal monster, because we keep voting for harm reduction. Harm reduction failed in practice; it was never a good idea in the first place.