this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
587 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
3012 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Because Boeing were on such a good streak already...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 27 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Wasn't it built so that the nose wheel wouldn't fall off?

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That design choice was revolutionary at the time.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I don't know where to put it but here's about MCAS anyway, the cost-cutting system meant to keep Boeing in the game, but also took over flight controls sometimes and nose dived planes straight into the ground, causing hundreds (some say thousands!) of fatalities:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maneuvering_Characteristics_Augmentation_System

[–] Welt@lazysoci.al 10 points 11 months ago

The front fell off, so just tow it outside the environment

[–] Rob@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Well obviously not… Because the nose wheel fell off.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Yes but probably management saw that as a problem limiting the future wheel assembly purchases. I mean you can land without the wheel right?