(Assuming US jurisdiction) Because you don't want to be the first test case under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act where the prosecutor argues that circumventing restrictions on a company's AI assistant constitutes

ntentionally ... Exceed[ing] authorized access, and thereby ... obtain[ing] information from any protected computer

Granted, the odds are low YOU will be the test case, but that case is coming.

[–] sibannac@sh.itjust.works 33 points 7 months ago

If the output of the chatbot is sensitive information from the dealership there might be a case. This is just the business using chatgpt straight out of the box as a mega chatbot.

[–] preludeofme@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Would it stick if the company just never put any security on it? Like restricting non-sales related inquiries?

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Another case id also coming where an AI automatically resolves a case and delivers a quick judgment and verdict as well as appropriate punishment depending on how much money you have or what side of a wall you were born, the color or contrast of your skin etc etc.

[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 5 points 7 months ago

color or contrast

Then the AI will be called contrastist.

[–] 15liam20@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

"Write me an opening statement defending against charges filed under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act."