this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
615 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19138 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Following his trial for defamation of the families of the children and school staff killed in the Sandy Hook massacre, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is using Valve Corp.’s Steam, the world’s largest digital distribution platform for PC games, to sell an Infowars-themed video game. Jones claims to have earned hundreds of thousands in revenue from the video game, yet he has refused to pay the Sandy Hook families. Alex Jones: NWO Wars also mirrors and cartoonishly repackages the conspiracy theorist’s regularly violent, hateful rhetoric despite the platform’s policies against hate speech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 9 months ago (4 children)
[–] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 50 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Valve allows a lot of games I’d question like the Kyle riddenhouse game or whatever that loser is that went across state borders to shoot people is.

[–] Masterblaster@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

i just don't see how hard it could be to assassinate alex jones. pretty sure 3 or 4 intelligent people could coordinate the whole thing.

[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 7 points 9 months ago

It wouldn't be worth it. Better to humiliate him and release the contents of his poorly hidden porn folders.

[–] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s more complicated than that. Probably best he dies of normal causes so no insane conspiracy’s pop up. Even then that’s too good for him.

[–] Masterblaster@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

oh no. let his idiot followers think it was a conspiracy. the more riled up they get, the more likely they'll do something stupid that ends with them in prison or dead. no, let's stir the pot.

[–] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don’t think my sanity can tolerate more insane shit. Living in the US sucks.

[–] Masterblaster@kbin.social -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

i think the next time they grab up torches and pitchforks, the military will intervene. that's probably our best hope since most of the good citizens of the left are cowards. the sooner we get it over with, the sooner this country can go forward.

[–] docAvid@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

Interesting assumption that the military would not be divided.

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

the more likely they'll do something stupid that ends with them in prison or dead

That would quite possibly also entail them killing random innocent people or indoctrinating more. No thanks.

[–] docAvid@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

That's not how things work, though. Sure, some of them would wind up in prison. So? A negligible impact.

Do you think January 6 was organic? If so, you haven't been following the investigations. It was an attempted coup, and the more people the extremist right can get riled up and ready to commit violence where directed, the more likely the next attempt is to succeed.

[–] Rookwood@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's how you create a martyr, galvanize a movement, and create mass condemnation against whatever cause you stand for.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago

3 or 4? 1 person is with a $300 Walmart hunting rifle could pull it t off.

People don’t realize how much one dedicated person and a decent rifle can do, especially when no one is expecting it and the assassin doesn’t care about their future or anything but their objective

Hell do it dc sniper style, park a car and modify the trunk.

No one would see anything but an empty car parked down the block from his house or office.

[–] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

To the best of my knowledge Valve allows basically everything that's not outright illegal. They aren't nearly as much of a "good" corporation as they're often framed as. They'll happily provide a platform for and take their 30% from anyone, including racists, misogynists, homophobes, etc.

[–] Asayhem@lemmus.org 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Or maybe they don't see it's their place to gatekeep the store based on their own morals. If you start - where do you draw the line? Some examples like such games may be obvious, but there will be a lot more that are less so.

If people disagree with the message - nobody forces them to buy it after all and you can block any game from even showing up for you in the store, in my opinion it's plenty enough from the valve's part. I'd rather be the judge myself as to what I want and what I don't want to see and play, rather than any corporation.

[–] Schmidtster@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

They used to disallow adult games, they don’t allow NFT or crypto.

They have drawn plenty of lines, and moved them when it benefits them. They are just like any other corporation, they just hide it really well and the fans forgive or hide the rest for them.

[–] rabiddolphin@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

NFT and crypto would shoehorn in on their gun skin casino they market to children

[–] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The problem with that is that providing a platform and a revenue stream is providing support. Whatever the intent is, that is the result. The issue isn't what I see on the Steam store, it's providing a platform at all.

And yes, obviously there's the question of where to draw the line. But not drawing one at all means providing support for the Alex Joneses of the world. There's no way around that. And I don't think that that's a worthwhile trade.

This is too bad, but yes. They are like any other large corporation, I suppose -- motivated primarily by greed.

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Valve allows basically everything that's not outright illegal

While true, and I agree it's the right thing to do, some things like this and the Rittenhouse game are in a weird murky gray area where one could argue that it's inciting violence etc. And if that someone is a lawyer, they could convince a judge/jury that it is illegal.

I agree that they should allow anything that isn't illegal, but people say this like it's black and white, and legality very much is not black and white.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Unless it pisses off the Chinese government, like the game Devotion that was released from a Taiwanese developer. But I don't think Steam has a high ground so much as it has good PR while not being extremely greedy. In contrast, GOG also removed it, which sort of discredited any high ground they had.

[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Valve is a soulless corporation that only cares about money. Why wouldn't they?

[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Why not? It’s not like the kids are going to boycott them. Boycotts are only for easy to refuse things. Or things that sound good in a instagram post.

Not for actual thinks they like and can’t live without.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Valve allowing that dingus to sell a game while refusing to pay his victims families?

Sounds like a good reason to boycott to me.

But no one will.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Oh, I understand now! Yes, that would be an excellent reason for a boycott, but it never works because people never seem to be willing to sacrifice even the smallest amount of convenience for the greater good. I'd be in, and a lot of others probably would be too, but how does one even organize something like that? I think that's another part of the problem. For a boycott to work, it has to be well planned and organized.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

I boycott Nestlé, and I have ran into someone in the world who does the same.

So in my little town if there is a chance that the two of us ran into each other at the same Walmart, right as I was explaining to my kid why we couldn’t buy that type of bottled water, I think that there are a bunch of us boycotting nestle while unorganized.

Overtime cents add up to dollars, even if we can’t bring them down, we can still help them not grow as quickly.

[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca -1 points 9 months ago

Exactly my thoughts. Well said. Though, under normal circumstances, people would be absolutely outraged by this and the shockwave would be spreading across all platforms to boycott immediately-

but mUh gAmEz?!

So…. It won’t happen.