this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)
Chess
1924 readers
12 users here now
Play chess on-line
FIDE Rankings
# | Player | Country | Elo |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Magnus Carlsen | ๐ณ๐ด | 2839 |
2 | Fabiano Caruana | ๐บ๐ธ | 2786 |
3 | Hikaru Nakamura | ๐บ๐ธ | 2780 |
4 | Ding Liren ๐ | ๐จ๐ณ | 2780 |
5 | Alireza Firouzja | ๐ซ๐ท | 2777 |
6 | Ian Nepomniachtchi | ๐ท๐บ | 2771 |
7 | Anish Giri | ๐ณ๐ฑ | 2760 |
8 | Gukesh D | ๐ฎ๐ณ | 2758 |
9 | Viswanathan Anand | ๐ฎ๐ณ | 2754 |
10 | Wesley So | ๐บ๐ธ | 2753 |
Tournaments
September 4 - September 22
Check also
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well youโre doing better than me. Iโve been casually playing for 6 years and 1350 in daily is my peak lol.
For me personally, I find Rapid 10 min games are a good in between for being able to manage your time and also perform the necessary calculations. Whatโs your Rapid rating out of curiosity?
Also youโre using chess.com I assume?
But yeah not that I am qualified to answer your question but I like to do a set of puzzles as a warm up before I start running through games. It seems to help me get into that tactical mindset and I can spot things quicker.
I do really like the rapid time control, it's just that it's a longer commitment and harder to find the time/focus for me. In a year of being into chess, I've only played 20 rapid games, with my rating sitting at 1170.
Yeah, I'm on chess.com (I know I know, it's not the FOSS option).
Understandable. I feel the same way about 30 min time controls. Just a bit too much of a time commitment.