Technology

60131 readers

2796 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

167

submitted 11 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Businesses that rely on creatives should probably avoid angering them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Your argument seems to be that we should consider the AI to itself be an artist and to grant it the rights of other artists.

That's fair.

But other artists aren't allowed to profit off reproducing other's works.

They also are compensated for their work.

Is OpenAI putting money in a trust for when their product gains sentience?

[–] 520@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

But other artists aren’t allowed to profit off reproducing other’s works.

But we do allow them to take inspiration from other artists and emulate their styles.

Much of the issue around AI art seems to be more about the prompter (IE: asking explicitly for copyrighted stuff or real people) than the AI itself.