this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
50 points (94.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7114 readers
371 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The cause was easy enough to identify: Data parsed by Kuhls and her colleagues showed that drivers were speeding more, on highways and on surface streets, and plowing through intersections with an alarming frequency. Conversely, seatbelt use was down, resulting in thousands of injuries to unrestrained drivers and passengers. After a decade of steady decline, intoxicated-driving arrests had rebounded to near historic highs.

... The relationship between car size and injury rates is still being studied, but early research on the American appetite for horizon-blotting machinery points in precisely the direction you’d expect: The bigger the vehicle, the less visibility it affords, and the more destruction it can wreak.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yiliu@informis.land 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, this was really interesting. The big revelation is that in Europe, the vast majority of cars (80+% or something) are standard transmission, whereas in the US the vast majority (95+%) are automatic.

And the thing is...you can't use your cellphone while you're driving a manual.

Combine that with the relatively gigantic cars & trucks that Americans prefer, and you get a long way to explaining the huge gap in relative fatalities.

Of course...that doesn't explain why fatalities are more than twice as high in the US as in Canada (where automatic transmissions & trucks are similarly popular)

[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well the obvious answer is that Canadians are just better than us lol

[–] yiliu@informis.land 3 points 8 months ago

As a Canadian, I'd love to believe that. As someone who's recently driven in and out of Vancouver a bunch of times...I really don't.