this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
326 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2772 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“The president has been adamant that we need to restore Roe. It is unfathomable that women today wake up in a country with less rights than their ancestors had years ago,” Fulks said.

Biden has been poised to run on what has been described as the strongest abortion rights platform of any general election candidate as he and his allies look to notch a victory in the first presidential election since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022.

Last month, Biden seized on a case in Texas, where a woman, Kate Cox, was denied an abortion despite the risk to her life posed by her pregnancy.

“No woman should be forced to go to court or flee her home state just to receive the health care she needs,” Biden said of the case. “But that is exactly what happened in Texas thanks to Republican elected officials, and it is simply outrageous. This should never happen in America, period.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago (4 children)

And several of those Senators in that supermajority were against abortion rights. I can name them if you actually care.

Mate, I literally warned you against this. Two of those Senators were from god damned Arkansas, one from Indiana, and one from Louisiana. This was not the Democratic Party of the 2020s. Several of them voted for a federal ban on late-term abortions and bans for the use of any federal funding for abortions. Our good friend Joe Manchin was also in that majority.

Please though, do try again. You seemed very confident that this pro-abortion majority definitely existed, so I'll wait.

[–] ApostleO@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago

Two things.

One: even removing those listed senators from the supermajority, that still leaves a majority.

Two: their original comment lamented that the Democrats never even held a vote when they had control with the intent of putting their votes on the record, so that voters would know who actually supports their rights.

[–] cosmic_slate@dmv.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The party shouldn't try to sell itself as the party saving abortion.

They aren't entirely bad for failing to deliver on saving abortion given the limitations. They're bad for claiming to be able to solve all these problems while actively maintaining/campaigning for people that prevent fixing these issues.

That said, the Republicans are worse and third-party votes are a shit-show in the US, so it's not like there's really any other good option.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Oooh!

You've got more than feelings right? and can demonstrate some kind of political understanding (far beyond ours) on how the Dems will codify abortion?

Cuz from what you've said so far you've only proved that the Dems can't, even with a supermajority. (But not a real one lol)

What's unsaid by you is that Dems would need a supermajority in both houses and that those Dems would also have to be pro-abortion right? If you show me your worth we can talk about that next.

Can you tell me, with your knowledge, how we'll get there? how that will go? How Bidens promise to "make it his top priority" in a year will work? I don't know much, but i feel like he should have started already. Can we focus on how i should believe him?

I think that will be very hard. Because he can't, or won't. What i mean by "won't" is "Won't do enough to make it happen." What they will do is have an excuse when they fail. An excuse just like yours.

But you're here to tell me this is different, right? Cuz to me it just seems like a cynical, open-ended promise to "try", from a party specializing in "sorry, we tried".

I don't understand why you're so proud of this argument in that case, one that provides more ammunition for those who believe the Democrats will never codify abortion.

Can you tell me why you're making it?

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Because his argument has understanding of the situation, and isn't a pithy tantrum.

If you want abortion, you have to vote for it. There are primaries coming up. Go vote for every pro-choice Republican and Democrat you can find. Let me know if you elect 60 of them to the Senate and 218 to Congress. Then you'll absolutely get your codified abortion rights.

Or maybe your whining about Dems will fix the problem.

[–] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago

Your big win is that for two months, during which Congress was scrambling to deal with a recession so bad we still feel its effects and Dems fought and lost a fight to get the public option in healthcare, they could have easily just codified the right to abortion. You're either a troll or an idiot. Either way, you have no idea what you're talking about.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And several of those Senators in that supermajority were against abortion right

Sounds like Democrats are shit bags too then and the whole "vote blue no matter who" won't actually solve anything.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why? Because expecting Democrats to serve the people who's votes they depend on is to tall an order? How fucking pathetic is that?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because you seem to prefer them

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I made it very clear who I preferred in the 2020 primaries and I would have happily voted for a number of others if they had made it to the general. Instead we got Joe Biden. The people who voted for him in the 2020 primaries can go fuck themselves. At the end of the day your opinion of me doesn't matter. You want my vote but you can't have it because you chose Joe fucking Biden in the 2020 primaries.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Third party voters are worse than Republican voters. Knock yourself out. And make sure you feel real good jerking it to how morally superior you are