this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2022
25 points (100.0% liked)
Science
13405 readers
7 users here now
Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
26 mins seems needlessly specific (and neither does the article claim that there's a consensus on this point) but overall allowing and even promoting people to take naps during shift is certainly positive.
Some concise people might struggle with a slovenly nap unless it has such definition. I think its specified like this to appeal to the target audience.