this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
35 points (60.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21249 readers
1761 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    35
    One of the few times I've downvoted (sh.itjust.works)
    submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Darken@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

    By prompting the user to open as file / install as package

    Like how many distros prompt (when opening executables) to open as file / run as a program

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    Yes, but the header of the file says it's a binary, that is why it gives you the option to run as a program or open as a file. Because the OS knows that you can do either with binaries.

    [–] Darken@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    Is it the +x permission?

    Why not use it the same way it is used in executables, but to indicate that a tar is installable

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Some file managers might add the +x automatically if you choose to run the binary through the desktop environment (not the terminal)... or ask you if you'd like to mark the file as an executable (i.e. add +x to permissions).

    You can't do it the same way with tar, what are you gonna execute, tar is neither a script or an ELF binary. It's like asking for a zip file to be executable, doesn't make sense. You can change the extension to .exe, but it won't run, it's not an exe, no MZ header, nothing 🤷.