Parts of it are. Vivaldi wants to retain its brand and doesn’t want people making forks and potentially tarnishing its reputation. And given how unpopular it is, they can’t really afford that to happen. I personally have no issues with Vivaldi wanting to keep things that way and I don’t mind it not being completely FOSS. Given how absolutely amazing the browser is and how customizable and feature-packed it is, it’s absolutely irresistible for me not to use it.

Here's a blog post from Vivaldi about it not being completely FOSS and their reasoning

They've also got a great privacy policy so I'm not concerned with privacy either.

Fun fact: Vivaldi is the go to browser for car makers such as Lamborghini, Mercedes, Audi and other car manufacturers https://vivaldi.com/android/automotive/

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I know about why they don't want to make it fully open source and I love how feature packed it is but I don't want to use non-free software as my web browser.

[–] siriusmart@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

absolutely proprietary

[–] pingu@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't Vivaldi a bit overkill/bloated? It has so many utilities integrated (mail, calendar, …)

[–] Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@pingu, I've been using it for 7 years and it has never appeared overloaded. There are some of the functions that I do not use and because of that I have hidden, however there are many others that come in very handy. But this is handled differently for each user, depending on how they use the browser. You can use extensions from the Chrome Store, but most are redundant in Vivaldi and not needed. You can give it the simple look of an old IE or of an Eurofighter panel and everything in between.

[–] pingu@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Oh ok, because when I tried it I was a bit overwhelmed about all the features that it has. And with every feature enabled at the beginning, the browser was a bit lagging.