this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
406 points (96.8% liked)

News

23667 readers
3579 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kevin Hines regretted jumping off San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge the moment his hands released the rail and he plunged the equivalent of 25 stories into the Pacific Ocean, breaking his back.

Hines miraculously survived his suicide attempt at age 19 in September 2000 as he struggled with bipolar disorder, one of about 40 people who survived after jumping off the bridge.

Hines, his father, and a group of parents who lost their children to suicide at the bridge relentlessly advocated for a solution for two decades, meeting resistance from people who did not want to alter the iconic landmark with its sweeping views of the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay.

On Wednesday, they finally got their wish when officials announced that crews have installed stainless-steel nets on both sides of the 1.7-mile (2.7-kilometer) bridge.

“Had the net been there, I would have been stopped by the police and gotten the help I needed immediately and never broken my back, never shattered three vertebrae, and never been on this path I was on,” said Hines, now a suicide prevention advocate. “I’m so grateful that a small group of like-minded people never gave up on something so important.”

Nearly 2,000 people have plunged to their deaths since the bridge opened in 1937.

City officials approved the project more than a decade ago, and in 2018 work began on the 20-foot-wide (6-meter-wide) stainless steel mesh nets. But the efforts to complete them were repeatedly delayed until now.

The nets — placed 20 feet (6 meters) down from the bridge’s deck — are not visible from cars crossing the bridge. But pedestrians standing by the rails can see them. They were built with marine-grade stainless steel that can withstand the harsh environment that includes salt water, fog and strong winds that often envelop the striking orange structure at the mouth of the San Francisco Bay.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (4 children)

So, now you just need to jump from the net after it catches you? That does not seem like much of a barrier.

[–] Pazuzu@midwest.social 39 points 11 months ago (2 children)

every barrier helps, most suicide attempts are impulse decisions. forcing people to jump 30 feet into a net before they can jump a lethal distance makes it that much harder to follow through.

[–] shiftenter@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

100%.

Several people have jumped into them. Some have been rescued from there, but “a handful” had “jumped into the net and then jumped to their death,” Mulligan said.

He declined to say how many. It will take a year or two of data to fully understand the system’s effectiveness, he said.

In the decade beginning in 2011, bridge officials said, there were 335 confirmed suicides, or an average of 33.5 per year. In 2022, as the first nets were being strung, there were 22. Through October this year, as more nets have been added, there were 13.

“If we save 30 lives a year, and not 31, it’s worth it for those 30 people who we saved,” Mulligan said. “And that’s every year. To greatly reduce the number of people dying in the community is a worthy goal. And to achieve that is success.”

Source

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But is it saving anyone or are they jumping from somewhere else?

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 11 months ago

Probably a bit of both. "Successful" suicide and following through with ideation is partly about opportunity. This is why likelihood of suicide is higher in homes with firearms, especially handguns, that are easy to access. Making following through with a suicidal impulse or ideation mitigates the situation for long enough for a good portion of people to shake it and/or get help.

There are still those that will seek out another way but, by mitigating the risk at the Golden Gate, resources that have been needed there can be partially re-allocated to other spaces to catch those that are still slipping through. In a sense, it's a bit like triage and whack-a-mole, where the population at the next target is likely smaller.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Not an impulse decision. It's been what I've wanted for the past couple years. When I tried, my finger wouldn't pull the trigger just like Dolores couldn't do it at first in Westworld.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think it's more "successful suicide" is generally an impulse decision because that disallows our self-preservation time to kick in.

That said, are you ok? Need someone to talk to? Why have you desired to end your life?

I'm not a qualified mental health professional but would be willing to lend a virtual ear, if you need it, and see if I can help to find resources available to you. I'm not going to be terribly available today but please feel free to DM me.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Self preservation is an impulse.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Wow, some absolute lemon actually downvoted you.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 29 points 11 months ago

Think of the first fall as a "proof of concept". If after falling ~20 feet to a chain link fence, you still feel like dragging your injured self to the edge of the fence to finish the job, then it's highly unlikely anything will stop you from killing yourself. The fence is kind of a "try before you buy" thing.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

A 20' drop to a steel rope net wouldn't be a soft landing. It's unlikely anyone would be able to, or be interested in, crawling to edge to finish the job.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh so you injure the person and laden them with medical debt, America really is great >:)

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They injure themselves.

Lol, what is up with this comment chain?

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

News posts regarding suicides turns depressed lurkers into commenters.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

They injure themselves? What are you trying to say?

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

This is still going to hurt a lot of people that jump, probably still broken backs and the occasional death.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is one of those "clever" comments that are actually just retarded if you think about it.

Did you read the article? One guy who jumped said he regretted it immediately after falling. This gives people an opportunity to experience that same regret before they try doing it again.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago

I too would regret suicide especially when if I say 'Im gonna do it again'. - I get to spend 3 days on a psychiatric hold

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I'm from Melbourne. We had a problem with people jumping from the West Gate bridge and we engineered safety barriers that reduced suicides to zero.

That's right. Zero.

It even reduced the jump rate by 65% at our other bridges. All that, without looking cheap and ugly AF.

Photo of bridge

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 points 11 months ago

All that and The Golden Gate Bridge is still way better looking. It's not even close.

[–] raptir@lemdro.id 1 points 11 months ago

Did it actually reduce suicides though, or just redirect them to other means?