this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
196 points (97.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8625 readers
1479 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It really does...

It really doesn't.

plenty of houses don't even bother with a computer any more.

You realize you're making the opposite point of the person you're trying to defend?

Eventually the technology gets to a point where it can fill that slot for gaming too

No it won't. There will be a mobile gaming market. And there will be a PC gaming market. And there will be very little overlap between them.

Most people don't need to be at the peka of tech (or even near it) and we already see lots of gaming households who just play switch, which is far below modern capabilities of games.

And we already see that the PC market greatly surpasses the Switch market, as well as the entirety of the combined console market.

It's simple physics. A device that fits in your hand will never be as powerful as one that sits on your desk. Regardless of how much technology advanced.

[–] Globulart@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not trying to defend anyone bud I'm just making the points as I see them. How does my comment go against their argument though? PCs have been getting phased out for decades and that'll continue.

Of course PCs will always be more powerful, but mobiles only need to be powerful ENOUGH (just like the very successful Switch console). I'm saying that eventually both mobiles and PCs will be powerful enough to play games at a quality most will accept, and only the hardcore will feel the need to get the absolute top tier experience, just like audiophiles do already.

Board games once outperformed the entire video games market too, things do change though.

Perfectly happy to admit the worlds best PC will always outstrip the worlds best phone, just like the world best earbuds will never outperform the world's best speakers, but that's not relevant to my point at all :) x

I'm not talking about the next 5 or 10 years either mate, I'm talking about 20 or 50 years, assuming society still exists.

And FYI, mobile gaming outstrips PC gaming by revenue already (PC and console combined in fact), you can expect to see it grow (whether for the right or wrong reasons) down the years as the tech allows for more actual "true gaming" options on phones that can be exploited by the corps.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How does my comment go against their argument though? PCs have been getting phased out for decades and that'll continue.

LOL their entire point was that PCs were popular because "everyone has one".

Perfectly happy to admit the worlds best PC will always outstrip the worlds best phone

The world's best phone will be "outstripped" by a basic desktop costing half the price. Always. Simple physics.

And FYI, mobile gaming outstrips PC gaming by revenue already

Yes I'm fully aware.

You need to scroll back up and read the comment thread you're replying to because I think you're lost:

We will never have the same power in a mobile device that we do in a desktop computer.

[–] Globulart@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I was making my point in the context of the thread mate. I.e. Will PCs dominate gaming in future? If your only point was that computers are more powerful than mobiles why not make that your response to my first comment? I thought this was a discussion about whether mobiles will continue to be as relevant in gaming as they are today, and I don't think they will.

I guess my point isnt that your original point is wrong, it's more that it's not paericularly relevant in this instance. And the PoV of the user is far more important (as evidenced by all those switch only gamers).

LOL their entire point was that PCs were popular because "everyone has one".

Who's entire point was that...? Because I just read every parent comment to this and it's not mentioned once, the only point I'm making is that I expect the majority of gaming to be done on mobile in the eventual future.

The world's best phone will be "outstripped" by a basic desktop costing half the price. Always. Simple physics.

This may be true today, but as PCs become only specialist equipment those basic machines will get rarer and rarer. It also doesn't matter if the smartphone is capable of playing AAA games at a comparable quality.

Slightly amused by the point you make about mobile/switch revenues... How is it that you can argue the PCs win vs switch because they earn more money, then in the next breath ignore the fact that mobile does that against all other gaming combined?

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If your only point was that computers are more powerful than PCs why not make that your response to my first comment?

My guy, you responded to that comment. And you need me to repeat myself? Just read better.

It also doesn't matter if the smartphone is capable of playing AAA games at a comparable quality.

They're not going to be able to play them at all, just like they aren't now.

Don't know how closely youve been paying attention but games are becoming more demanding, not less. Some of them aren't even capable of running stably on high end desktop hardware. Modern minimum hardware requirements are insane.

[–] Globulart@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Read my response again mate, the irony of telling me to read better is kinda delicious xD

My guy, you responded to that comment. And you need me to repeat myself? Just read better.

No, I didn't respond to that comment, I responded to the comment where you confidently and incorrectly stated that PoV wasn't relevant :) x