this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
357 points (91.4% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4887 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The animating concept behind the Trump campaign will be chaos. This is what history shows us fascists do when given the chance to participate in democratic political campaigns: They create chaos. They do it because chaos works to their advantage. They revel in it, because they can see how profoundly chaos unnerves democratic-republicans—everyone, that is, whether liberal or conservative, who believes in the basic idea of a representative government that is built around neutral rules. Fascism exists to pulverize neutral rules.

So they campaign with explicit intention to instill a sense of chaos. And then comes the topper: They have the audacity to insist that the only solution to the chaos—that they themselves have either grossly exaggerated or in some cases created!—is to vote for them: “You see, there is nothing but chaos afoot, and only we can restore order!”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If the democrats were prepared Biden wouldn't be on the ballot

[–] hansl@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

He’s the incumbent. The last incumbents to not be reelected were Trump and HW Bush. Tell me again why Biden is unelectable.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because Biden is a lot closer to HW Bush than he is to Obama. One of the reasons he got the nod in the first place was his promise not to run for re-election. And where we are now is why.

[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Biden specifically said he would not promise to serve one term.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh bullshit he said that once while telling everyone around him that he was a one term president. And he continually referred to himself as a transition president or a stopgap bridge to the next generation.

The message was received by voters.

[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/11/biden-single-term-082129

Another top Biden adviser put it this way: “He’s going into this thinking, ‘I want to find a running mate I can turn things over to after four years but if that’s not possible or doesn’t happen then I’ll run for reelection.’ But he’s not going to publicly make a one term pledge.”

...

A top Biden adviser said Biden ruled out a one-term pledge when the issue was raised before he even entered the race. “He said it was a nonstarter,” the adviser said, adding that Biden believed it was a “gimmick.”

...

In April [2019], when asked whether he would serve just one term, Biden responded, “No.” More recently, Biden has been ambiguous. In October, The Associated Press reported that when “asked whether he would pledge to only serve one term if elected, Biden said he wouldn’t make such a promise but noted he wasn’t necessarily committed to seeking a second term if elected in 2020.”

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Even in your own quotes.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 8 months ago

How about we get a president that isn't over 70 and doesn't require uppers to function, like biden, or literal adult diapers, like trump.

Both options are garbage and both men need to retire.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The last incumbents to not be reelected were Trump and HW Bush.

Funny that you didn't mention Carter.

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Last 40 years not good enough? Even with Carter the odds are better for the incumbent.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Oh it's not that, it's just there is so few presidents that didn't win their second election, and you listed all of them except one particular democrat, is all.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

People don't think he does enough. And "his son". Basically it's to just be edgy. Dude has taken a shit show and make it resemble an office again.