this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
110 points (95.1% liked)

Fediverse

27914 readers
288 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Out of curiosity I went to exploding-heads.com and it looks like it's not working anymore. Is there a new place they hang out now? Are they undercover on the regular servers or something? It'd be a little surprising to me if they all just gave up on being active on the Fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If the most powerful government on earth contacts the largest and most powerful companies on earth in order to categorically suppress or delete certain viewpoints or certain speakers, then by definition that is “‘the establishment’ censoring you”. The fact that you agree with the censorship doesn’t make it not censorship, and framing it in a moralistic way doesn’t make it not censorship. Being moralistic didn’t make it not censorship when the right was doing it.

Ruud is categorically suppressing or deleting certain viewpoints or speakers? Or some other Lemmy admin is doing so? Can you give an example?

Exploding-heads as I understand it was facing DDOS attacks near the end (or at least they thought it was), that’s one of the things that prompted the admin to shut it down, it wasn’t worth the effort to try to keep the site up and running under such an onslaught.

I definitely don't agree with doing this, to whatever extent it was actually happening. Are you saying it was the US government or some powerful company doing that? Can you point me (or send me in a DM or something) some of the truths that they were trying to discuss that were being censored or silenced so I can look into them for myself?

Anyway, I don’t know why I’d even try. You know what? You win. Everything is fine

This is a perfect example of what I was talking about in my earlier comment, about framing disagreement as an "attack." No one is attacking you, and you don't need to start feeling downtrodden if it seems like what they're saying is making some sense.

Honestly, I don't have the slightest bit of any kind of personal ill will to you, and I doubt the other people here do either. I'm gonna tell you if I think you're wrong, but it's not like that's a quest to make you feel bad or look bad or anything. It's just how I see it, and I explain it in detail hoping that it might make sense to some people and they might get some value from it.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ruud is categorically suppressing or deleting certain viewpoints or speakers? Or some other Lemmy admin is doing so? Can you give an example?

It's fairly easy to get banned on lemmygrad for having a (perceived) liberal attitude, to name the obvious example.

[–] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I argued pretty extensively with tankies on lemmygrad at one point; they were convinced I was a western liberal and told me so. I never got banned. They got sick of the conversation and the questions I was asking, and abandoned it long before I was ready to quit.

Not saying you're wrong; I could believe that lemmygrad specifically is actually intolerant of dissent, in the way sj_zero claims that all of Lemmy is. I'm just saying that my one experience with them was that they never censored me.

[–] sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net -4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Wolfballs and exploding-heads didn't show up as a response to lemmy instances, they showed up in response to big tech censorship, which we have a lot of evidence was being heavily manipulated. As I said in my initial post, wolfballs was created and shut down before most of the big lemmy instances today even started, and exploding-heads was started before most lemmy instances existed.

I'm not saying that the US government did the DDOS attacks. I doubt the US government was the cause of shutting down wolfballs or exploding-heads except insofar as the establishment powers that be took advantage of idiots being tribal to push their pet policies to the exclusion of any others (which too many people fell for and continue to fall for hook line and sinker). Another form of attack is the omnipresent risk of cancelation hanging over anyone's head who isn't in line with the current orthodoxy.

I'm not letting you guys win because I think these replies are attacks, but because lemmy has become so ideologically homogenous in part because reddit became so ideologically homogenous. What's the point? I already know what you're going to say because it's one big groupthink that at one point I was myself a part of (along with most of society), so there's no benefit to it. I'm seeking truth, and there's nothing new to be found in arguing with people after I've been saturated in their unconvincing arguments for years. So you win, yep, stupid me.

[–] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The core point that I'm making is that as far as I can tell, you can express unpopular views on Lemmy. Someone in another comment dug up your modlog to check if you've been being censored. I would argue that all your talk about censorship, when viewed in the light of the lack of any actual censorship (on Lemmy) and your silence when asked directly what views you'd like to share that you're unable to because of censorship, means that what you want to be free from is not censorship, but criticism.

lemmy has become so ideologically homogenous in part because reddit became so ideologically homogenous. What’s the point?

On this I mostly agree with you, yes. You can still say your stuff even if everyone's yelling at you. I've done it. It's fine. Your comment just sits there with a big negative number, up for anyone to read.

I already know what you’re going to say

Not even close. Would you like to start talking with me about how the police are generally out doing a difficult and dangerous job, and the vast majority of them don't do anything wrong and get tarred unfairly with the ACAB brush, and watch as none of our comments get removed? That's actually what I believe, and presumably you agree with me, and most Lemmy people hate it.

You actually made me look back in my comment history and laugh out loud, because I found the comment where I was strongly encouraging some ACAB people to find some unincorporated land somewhere and create a whole new town with no police presence at all, since they were saying no cops would be a huge improvement, and they could live in paradise. They hated my suggestion. No one was willing to articulate why they didn't want to do that though; they just downvoted me.

I’m seeking truth, and there’s nothing new to be found in arguing with people after I’ve been saturated in their unconvincing arguments for years. So you win, yep, stupid me.

I constantly learn things from people I'm arguing with, even when their arguments in my opinion are dead wrong. In all seriousness, that's part of why I'm talking with you right now. Because maybe I am wrong, or maybe in the course of the conversation I'll learn something I didn't know before.

Again: I am literally asking. Please share your truth with me. I would like to know what you are being prevented from sharing on Lemmy. I may not agree with it, but I would like to hear.