this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
328 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

58451 readers
6262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Moore's law has been dead for a long long time.

E: if you're downvoting this it's because you don't have a clue what you're talking about. Moore's law was the observation that transistor density would double every ~2 years. That's not happening and hasn't for a long time.

[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No need to downvote this. It's an insidery technically correct statement. We've redefined how we measure Moore's law several times to make it "keep working" and some people designing chips, not selling them, think it's not only outlined it's usefulness but also not true anymore.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

In my experience, a lot of people incorrectly conflate Moore's Law with "computers get faster"

So when you say Moore's Law is dead and it's unrealistic to expect it not to be, they get upset and jump to the conclusion that you're defending tech companies for giving paltry upgrades, which obviously isn't what I'm doing.

There are other things to PCs getting faster in a post Moore's Law world. Architecture improvements, hardware acceleration, advanced packaging such as AMD's chiplet technology, etc - these are all commonplace and have replaced the idea of "let's just double transistor counts every two years"

[–] fugacity@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Moore's law hasn't died, if you mean number of transistors per area. Linear scaling to transistor counts has.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It absolutely has. Transistor count in an area absolutely is not doubling every two years.

[–] fugacity@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

I just checked. Yup, you're right. Funny though that Pat of all people claims it's not dead lol