this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
37 points (97.4% liked)

Open Source

31250 readers
571 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm looking to replace my portable modem with a GL.iNet router because I saw that they claim to use OpenWRT which is a open source firmware.

My question is:

Is their OpenWRT version actually reliable?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] starkzarn@infosec.pub 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you have any question on truth worthiness, you can flash stock openwrt on them. You just lose out on their proprietary webUI and pre installed plugins. I believe their firmware is public on GitHub though.

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

but in your opinion Do you think their proprietary UI could be a risk for privacy /security ?

[–] starkzarn@infosec.pub 6 points 10 months ago

I haven't done a code review so I can't answer that question with facts. I do think however, that anything that bootstraps a FLOSS framework like openwrt could easily be a risk to privacy.

You use privacy and security interchangeably here. They are not the same.

[–] catacomb@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

The biggest issue most people have with it is the dynamic DNS feature, which is automatically enabled and contacts their server to create the record. If you turn this off before connecting the router to the internet, you're probably good.

The simplified DoH client also only allows either Cloudflare or NextDNS, which aren't the most privacy-oriented options. Still, it's possible to set up your own.

Otherwise I've never heard of anything major; the devices are cheap and reliable. I've had one running constantly for years and only had to reboot it manually once.