this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
48 points (98.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40149 readers
544 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Just thought I'd share this since it's working for me at my home instance of federate.cc, even though it's not documented in the Lemmy hosting guide.

The image server used by Lemmy, pict-rs, recently added support for object storage like Amazon S3, instead of serving images directly off the disk. This is potentially interesting to you because object storage is orders of magnitude cheaper than disk storage with a VM.

By way of example, I'm hosting my setup on Vultr, but this applies to say Digital Ocean or AWS as well. Going from a 50GB to a 100GB VM instance on Vultr will take you from $12 to $24/month. Up to 180GB, $48/month. Of course these include CPU and RAM step-ups too, but I'm focusing only on disk space for now.

Vultr's object storage by comparison is $5/month for 1TB of storage and includes a separate 1TB of bandwidth that doesn't count against your main VM, plus this content is served off of Vultr's CDN instead of your instance, meaning even less CPU load for you.

This is pretty easy to do. What we'll be doing is diverging slightly from the official Lemmy ansible setup to add some different environment variables to pict-rs.

After step 5, before running the ansible playbook, we're going to modify the ansible template slightly:

cd templates/

cp docker-compose.yml docker-compose.yml.original

Now we're going to edit the docker-compose.yml with your favourite text editor, personally I like micro but vim, emacs, nano or whatever will do..

favourite-editor docker-compose.yml

Down around line 67 begins the section for pictrs, you'll notice under the environment section there are a bunch of things that the Lemmy guys predefined. We're going to add some here to take advantage of the new support for object storage in pict-rs 0.4+:

At the bottom of the environment section we'll add these new vars:

  - PICTRS__STORE__TYPE=object_storage
  - PICTRS__STORE__ENDPOINT=Your Object Store Endpoint
  - PICTRS__STORE__BUCKET_NAME=Your Bucket Name
  - PICTRS__STORE__REGION=Your Bucket Region
  - PICTRS__STORE__USE_PATH_STYLE=false
  - PICTRS__STORE__ACCESS_KEY=Your Access Key
  - PICTRS__STORE__SECRET_KEY=Your Secret Key

So your whole pictrs section looks something like this: https://pastebin.com/X1dP1jew

The actual bucket name, region, access key and secret key will come from your provider. If you're using Vultr like me then they are under the details after you've created your object store, under Overview -> S3 Credentials. On Vultr your endpoint will be something like sjc1.vultrobjects.com, and your region is the domain prefix, so in this case sjc1.

Now you can install as usual. If you have an existing instance already deployed, there is an additional migration command you have to run to move your on-disk images into the object storage.

You're now good to go and things should pretty much behave like before, except pict-rs will be saving images to your designated cloud/object store, and when serving images it will instead redirect clients to pull directly from the object store, saving you a lot of storage, cpu use and bandwidth, and therefore money.

Hope this helps someone, I am not an expert in either Lemmy administration nor Linux sysadmin stuff, but I can say I've done this on my own instance at federate.cc and so far I can't see any ill effects.

Happy Lemmy-ing!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah! Noted. That said, it is definitely storing the bytes on the object store. I imagine someone clever with nginx or such could set up some rewrite rules to bypass pictrs entirely for GET requests, but unfortunately that's beyond my pay grade here.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not an expert either, but if you do it through nginx I think it will still depend on your single VPS. There probably needs to be a change in the Lemmy-ui to tell the browser to download directly from the object storage CDN.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thinking about this a little more: I think yeah the HTTP requests will always hit your VPS, but if what you're saying is that pictrs is loading from object store and then re-serving them off your VPS, then an NGINX rule might be able to redirect the GET directly to the object store; so that instead of transferring the actual image bytes, it just 204's the browser through to the object store. I don't know how feasible this is but I may play around with it to see.

[–] cablepick@lemmy.cablepick.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pict-rs uses a database to match the uri hash to the file name on disk or object store. This allows for deduplication. It always needs to sit between storage and requests. I have my instance setup to use a separate CDN domain and caching servers to reduce load in my instance. One day soon I hope to get a write done on how to do it.

[–] lodion@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This allows for deduplication

Really? I've found uploading the same image to pict-rs multiple times gives a different hash. It does not seem to dedupe at all.

[–] cablepick@lemmy.cablepick.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It allows for different hashes on the front end so individual users can still delete their upload. The sled database maps front end to back end hashes. At least this is what I read from the developer in their matrix chat room.

[–] lodion@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Oh ok, that makes sense. Thanks for the info.