this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
513 points (96.7% liked)

News

23399 readers
4668 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExLisper@linux.community 3 points 11 months ago (4 children)

The pit bull discussion never ends. Pit bulls are like guns: objectively bad for society but some people really want to have them so we all have to suffer the consequences. Pit bull lovers don't care about all the victims, they only care about their personal needs and "rights". You can't convince someone not to be selfish so the entire discussion doesn't make any sense.

[–] Ascrod@midwest.social 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There are no bad dogs, only bad owners.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This has been said so many times it's boring: chihuahua with a bad owner never killed anyone.
Also: would you support mandatory background checks, permits and training for pit bull owners? To make sure that they only go to good owners...

[–] Ascrod@midwest.social 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I support educating pet owners, and regulating "puppy mills".

Dogs aren't guns.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 11 months ago

Educating and regulating how? Mandatory certificates for pit bull owners? What regulations of "puppy mills" would stop pit bulls from killing people?

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's not what the data shows though. The vast majority of dog attacks are by pitbulls.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Except the major source everyone cites is one psycho who composes his data exclusively by going through news reports of dog attacks and determining it was a pit bull if any news source called it a pit bull rather than any scientific methodology whatsoever

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 11 months ago

Super reliable! You know, the same news sources that call every 1-hand bang-bang-thingy a "glock", a wooden two-hand bang-bang-thingy an AK-47, and a black shovel an Assault-Rifle-15-mall-sweeping-military-style-bump-stock-war-machine assault weapon.

Yeah I'm sure they're great at differentiating dog breeds too! XD

[–] rab@lemmy.ca -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What reason would someone have to do that though? Probably was attacked by a pitbull in the past lol

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes. She tried to run past someone and their dog on a narrow walk without speaking. Turns out running up behind a strange dog and touching it or almost touching it can lead to bad things. Who would have known except literally everyone else on the planet.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago

Pretty sure that might only happen with a pitbull or Rottweiler. You can't link me an example of it happening with any other breed.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It makes me sad how many ignorant people upvoted this.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Kids killed by pit bulls make me sadder.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Irresponsible parenting makes me the saddest.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ah yes, it’s the parent letting their daughter play in the backyard that’s at fault, not the neighbor’s pit bull that crushed her trachea.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What is ignorant about it? I see a ton of facts. I’ve long said pit bulls are the assault rifles of the dog world. Much like it is easy to claim every gun and every dog can be dangerous with the wrong owner, somehow when a tragedy happens is is disproportionately one particular type at the center.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's why mental health checks should be given to gun owners, outlawing them just makes us vulnerable to outside attacks. The problem isn't too many people with guns, the problem is too many mentally unhealthy people with guns and not enough mentally healthy with guns. Most mass shootings wouldn't happen if everyone they were shooting had guns themselves.

Dogs on the other hand are completely different. Your racially biased when it comes to pitbulls, no question about it. Do you see that more crimes are committed by minorities and think it's because of their skin color too?

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When logic fails, accuse the other side of racism.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You're literally saying one type of dog is more dangerous than others. What other word is there to describe that than racist? I wasn't accusing you of being racist towards other humans, I was asking if you were. My point was that you are doing the same thing "intellectual" racists do to justify their bias against specific groups. You can't deny your racist against pitbulls though, that's your entire argument.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Dog breeds are not races. This is seriously one of the stupidest takes I’ve ever heard.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You don't have anything better to say?

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

An idea so stupid doesn’t need more of a response. Pit bulls were selectively bred for thousands of years for fighting, bull baiting, and killing rats. Very different that human races (and as my Afro American studies prof liked to tell us, there is no race but the human race.)

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Okay, that's a really good point that I can't think of an argument for. I'm also relieved that you don't have the same ignorance for people and are actually apparently well educated about the subject. To your professors point, that's exactly why racism is pure ignorance.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lmao so I'm using the wrong word? You don't have anything else to add to your side of the argument? I'm sorry for saying pitbull racist instead whatever word you would prefer. Please ignore that and give your rebuttal for the point I was making. When people revert to semantics, it's a pretty good indicator that they don't have any value to add to their argument and are grasping at straws. I hope that's not the case with you though.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

So semantics is your final rebuttal. Great.