this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
86 points (87.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

29723 readers
2272 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
vatlark@lemmy.world
forkball@lemmy.world
quinten@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
86
Instead of only voting for one candidate we should be able to upvote or downvote each candidate (merv.news)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by nix@merv.news to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It would be great to be able to vote for every candidate in an election instead of only once and you can decide to upvote, downvote, or not vote for any candidate. This way you never “throw away” your vote and extreme/hated candidates can be downvoted so if im not a fan of any candidate but one is particularly awful I can downvote that one and not vote any I don’t like while still making my voice heard that I definitely don’t want this specific candidate

Edit: Combined Approval Voting is what I want and its used by to elect the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee and the Secretary General of the United Nations

Edit 2: You can learn about and try different voting methods in this amazing project https://ncase.me/ballot/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 47 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Have you ever heard of Ranked Choice, or Instant Runoff Voting?

[–] sp6@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I was all-in for ranked choice voting (and even started working on an app for it) until I learned that a candidate who would have won can end up losing by becoming more popular, which is extremely counterintuitive, and a flaw that I don't think any voting system should have.

Nicky Case wrote a fantastic explanation about how that can happen, plus exploring many other voting methods: https://ncase.me/ballot/

I still think RCV (and really anything else) would be better than the US's first-past-the-post system, but I'd definitely prefer some type of approval, score, or STAR voting over it.

[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Yes. Often there are unintended results. I think another issue is that many people would have difficulty understanding the math behind it. It is not complex but it doesn't end up with concise results sometimes and distrust in the system can certainly jilt some people as we have witnessed enough.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

That was a fantastic explanation, thanks for that

[–] nix@merv.news 4 points 11 months ago

I have. What i want is an improved verison of Approval Voting