this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
967 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

59346 readers
7627 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What a fucking hateful choice of colours. Green for blocking and red for allowing communication. Really shows what kind of perspective the creator has.

[–] SeedyOne@lemm.ee -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Apparently this is a divisive topic, moreso than expected. Edited for clarity.

Huh? Green means it has been blocked and needs no further action. Red means it needs attention [if you're on the side of defederating that is].

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Everywhere else, red means stop and green means go. Here, the creator has chosen to reverse that to emphasize that they consider blocking to be good and allowing people to connect to be bad.

No attention is needed for the instances that are marked with red. They are federating.

[–] calvinbacon@r.nf 2 points 11 months ago

I AM FROM THE INTERNET I CAN ONLY DO WHAT SIMON SAYS

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The point is that it's portraying not blocking as an inherently negative thing, which isn't universally agreed upon at all. Plenty of people would say that they don't need any attention at all. It's not presenting objective in a neutral way, but rather labeling a group as bad.

Of course, it's probably fair to assume that the author has no intention of being neutral, but it's still valid grounds to criticize it as a data visualization.

[–] sheepishly@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't think I'd expect political neutrality from the admin of a website literally called "veganism" anyway.

[–] SeedyOne@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

You shouldn't expect it from ANY site really.

[–] SeedyOne@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the clarification, your second to last line says it all. Sometimes it's easy to forget that many online lack critical thinking skills and/or don't consider the source when browsing. Better to accommodate the lowest common denominator when possible...but to expect that from a biased, private site is asking a lot IMHO.