this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
1364 points (98.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35441 readers
1320 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 27 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Could this be considered discrimination? Rejecting applicant based on something they have no control over and unrelated to the position.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I doubt individual birthdays are considered a protected class, so I doubt it.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

... yet.

You arent going to write protections until it becomes apparent they are needed.

Stupidest timeline? Maybe

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Discrimination as such I don't think so but under the new EU AI regulations they'd be in a world of hurt. For one, did they tell OP that the answer was AI-generated and, as this is a high-risk use of AI, did they include a link to report incidents, do they have human oversight, can they prove that they monitored the AI properly, that it was created with risk management in mind?

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Probably not. It's super expensive to do it properly. Definitely in the millions of dollars range.

[–] DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A good lawyer could probably argue a case for age discrimination.

After all, if they were one day older or younger, they would not have been summarily denied.

[–] foofy@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Most (maybe all) age discrimination statutes only protect people over 40 so may not apply here depending on the specifics.

[–] DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I am not a good lawyer