this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
249 points (87.6% liked)

Funny

6581 readers
20 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The point is that there are benefits to several different arithmetic bases for different purposes and forming some kind of dogma around any of them is weird.

[–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well, there isn't a perfect one... better just agree on using one, whichever that might be.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Agree, so we will all just use hexadecimal since it is a convenient way to represent both fixed point and floating point arithmetic.

[–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sure, I'm down with that if everyone else is.

[–] joranvar@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Username does (not) check out.

[–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Ah, ASCII runs deep in this one I see 🫡.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There is no dogma, when doing maths you're free to use anything even as esoteric as Fibonacci base. The problem is when this becomes widespread but not everywhere.

If you're for using it "for different purposes" I can't even understand the point of your original comment, why preach?

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I am definitely not the one being preachy about a particular base. I am the one advocating flexibility over dogma.

All I did was point out that 12 is easier to divide cleanly than ten, and this very simple fact has pissed many people off for some reason.