this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
587 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

58108 readers
5249 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
L4s@lemmy.world
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
587
Suspects can refuse to provide phone passcodes to police, court rules (arstechnica.com)
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Suspects can refuse to provide phone passcodes to police, court rules::Phone-unlocking case law is "total mess," may be ripe for Supreme Court review.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Mamertine@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Last I heard biometrics were not protected. As in you have to unlock your phone upon request. A code, pattern or other thing you know was treated differently from using your body to unlock your phone.

[โ€“] Ashe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago

In my state, police aren't allowed to use your fingerprint against you, but they can use facial recognition. It's backwards and doesn't make a ton of sense, but that's the state of affairs.