Technology

59174 readers

1811 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

587

Suspects can refuse to provide phone passcodes to police, court rules (arstechnica.com)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

93 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Suspects can refuse to provide phone passcodes to police, court rules::Phone-unlocking case law is "total mess," may be ripe for Supreme Court review.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I'll keep saying it; The Supreme Court is conservative, not partisan. They owe Trump nothing and have had a few surprising decisions lately.

I don't trust them a bit, but neither do I trust they'll always make the wrong call.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I don’t think that’s right. A group that very strongly believes in the Republican Party and its agenda and values would still be definitively partisan. Partisan has always been used in the context of following party lines, not necessarily one person.

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

But you can trust they will make the wrong call after geting a very expensive vacation and a few dufflebags of money.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

If you believe this, I'm not sure you've been paying attention.

The Federalist Society is 100% in bed with the Republican party, and they have chosen essentially every SCOTUS pick by a Republican President since (at least) George W. Bush.

They also stacked our federal courts during Trump's tenure.

To suggest it's not partisan is naive.

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Hey, thanks, that's a useful (and probably fairly accurate) distinction and I'm happy to find that a positive shift in my viewpoint, if minor. The corruption might be a really big problem or it might be one guy who's an aberration for being wildly outside the court's norms, really unclear on that part. But I needed a solid reminder that it's not quite yet another ruined and hypocritical institution we once held dear.