It's a shit argument and it's ABSOLUTELY thought policing. You can't say someone will do something until there's been something done. It's just not how things work. Yes, that includes if they strongly believe that any specific group of people should be killed, for any reason, unless they've ACTUALLY KILLED A PERSON OR MADE AN ATTEMPT. Anything short of that? That's called thought policing bud.

Unless you're not talking modern-day Nazis. If you're just talking about the WW2 Nazis that actively rounded up Jews and didn't see any problems with it, well... Yeah, we went to war over that. It was one of the few good reasons for a conflict. That's dead and done.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Your entire argument is we're not allowed to so much as CRITICIZE a nazi until they commit a genocide, regardless of the fact that they already did that once.

Eat my whole ass, you murderous nazi piece of shit.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works -4 points 11 months ago

Who said anything about not criticizing them? Jesus you are unhinged. The fuck you think I'm doing everywhere else? Making actual fucking arguments about why Nazis are bad, not just spouting "kill people kill people!"

Do you want to END Nazis or do you just want to be able to KILL Nazis?