this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
99 points (84.6% liked)

Electric Vehicles

3215 readers
310 users here now

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cosmic_slate@dmv.social 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

…why do you spend so much time on pedantry instead of arguing like a rational participant?

Yes, the investor slides are global numbers. The intent was to compare against the global Supercharge.info numbers to reasonably justify how close the two are because I’d need to use the supercharge numbers on my next point.

Fact of the matter is, you just aren’t accepting data that opposes your narrative, and I’m not sure what to say besides “sorry buddy”.

We’re at the point where I’m saying the earth is round and having to defend that it’s not a perfect sphere where you’re refusing to believe it isn’t flat.

You haven’t correctly pointed any actual errors out and defer to pointing out the lack of clarity of my intent with the global stats.

You still have yet to demonstrate how tesla only built 21 supercharger locations over 1 year in a correct manner.

Ultimately, have fun with NACS and I hope you take a moment to reflect on your responses to engage productively in the future.

[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Still skipping the Cruz of the topic. Nice. Anyway, bye.

[–] cosmic_slate@dmv.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, you’ve simply shown to be unable to cite your point.

[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

I've restated it several times, and you keep bringing up straw man arguments. Possibly because you skim rather than reading, perhaps because you're unable to fully grasp what I said. But either way, you've demonstrated that you're hung up on nonsense, so I think it's best we both move on.