this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1112 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59118 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
1112
Ifixit gives fairphone 5 a 10/10 on repairability and maintanence (www.ifixit.com)
submitted 10 months ago by DacoTaco@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
373 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

While they were happy with what the fairphone 4 brought to the table, they seem to like what was changed for the fairphone 5.
What are you guys' opinions on this? A welcome change? would you get one if your phone died within the next year?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Iirc the chipset, QCM6490, will lose support after 2028 meaning the device will get at least 5 years of security updates and not the promised 8. Pretty sure that's why grapheneOS doesn't/won't support it since the company doesn't keep to their promises

Edit: found grapheneOS' response again I'm not saying Fairphone is a bad company but the way they are advertising the fp5 seems kinda shady IMO based on the specs of the device. At most you'll get partial updates after 5 years since Qualcomm will drop support which is still great but don't assume your device will be as safe as a fully updated device. Then again fairphone may commit to extending the life of the QCM6490 but not sure if they'll be capable of that so we'll just have to see. I apologize to anyone who got offended for some reason I was just expressing my opinion based on the track record of the company and the specs of their device

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

deleted

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Which is why I don't think I'm getting the fp. I don't want to pay a premium price for a less secure phone than one with graphene