this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
625 points (83.6% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
1811 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RickyWars@lemmy.ca 153 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Cool that average FPS is better but:

The impressive FPS deltas aside, it should be mentioned that, with the exception of Arch Linux, average frame times (measured as 1% lows, in this case) on Linux were generally behind what Windows managed by up to 20%

I feel like worse 1% lows makes this title misleading. Hopefully with time this gap will close.

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

1 % lows are likely a driver thing (Nvidia calls it "Game Ready Drivers"), with Arch you'll get new drivers (or kernel versions) much earlier, similar to Windows.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

... Then why did they get the results that they did in the article?

[–] averyfalken@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 11 months ago

The article specifies arch as an exception to that