this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
1196 points (98.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21219 readers
146 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Dmian@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

    But I’m not talking about programming languages, I’m talking about CLI programs, or system commands.

    And I’m not telling a GUI would be better, or more efficient, I’m just saying that it can be done (something you are saying too about programming languages).

    That’s the point: a GUI can replace a CLI. Is it better? Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn’t. Is it possible? Absolutely.

    [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    I would assert that basically every shell I'm aware of is also a programming/scripting langauge, able to handle things like loops and branches. This is possible to do in a GUI but it's kind of telling no one has achieved this in a desktop environment to any significant degree, including in the Linux space.

    "Iterate over all of the files in this folder, if it's a video file of any format, create a folder with the same name as the video file in ~/Videos and move the file there." I'm unaware of an OS desktop environment that can do even that level of automation with default GUI tools. It's like 5 lines of Bash including "done;" at the end. You can probably do it in PowerShell, but I bet Windows power users would rather use AutoHotKey for this.

    [–] Dmian@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    You really can't imagine doing that with a GUI? Here you have something to give you an idea (sorry it's in Spanish, but I guess you can get an idea of how it may work):

    Here I'm selecting a specific type of files (PDFs, but I can select several different types, as I'm organising by file type), after which I did a right click, and selected a contextual action that shows a popup to do a following action. In this case it's renaming, but it could easily be a "Move to..." that could include a check option of "Create a folder for each file". I mean, it was actually pretty fast too. It's not that difficult.

    [–] howrar@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    It wouldn't make sense to add clutter to a GUI that benefits a tiny fraction of users a tiny fraction of the time while making the experience worse for everyone else.

    [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

    I can imagine making a GUI that does it. But most aren't able to. "That could include a check option of..." yeah it doesn't though, is my point. GUIs are for doing things manually.