this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
294 points (95.9% liked)

News

22874 readers
5364 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The 2/3 of the country can generally be fooled to believe anything.

However, just raising taxes in this case may have some similarity to extinguishing fire with a burnable substance.

You have to raise some taxes (say, on realty ownership, and some other possessions, and in general discourage possession of wealth without circulation) and lower some other taxes (say, anything taxing a transaction, I'm really not familiar with the way taxes work in USA, but in Russia plenty of taxes in hard numbers simply discourage economic activity). The goal should be increasing the actual inflation (not a good or bad thing per se). That's if you are right about the cause, which I'm in doubt about TBF.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In the US income taxes are different at different income levels and corporate taxes are separate entirely. We can absolutely raise taxes without raising them on lower income people.

And yes several studies over the last couple decades have shown that US money is going up and not coming back down.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Differentiating income levels is another thing.

I'm talking about encouraging people to put in use as much as possible of what they own, which means that making interaction cheaper via lowering some taxes is important to do not only for the "lower income level" people, actually it's most important for the "rich". That's the candy part of encouraging economic activity, and the boot part would be taxing properties (should be done carefully, or, say, large realty companies are going to be less affected than individual owners with only their apartment\house, which would be a complete failure).

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's trickle down. You just described what we've been trying for the last 60 years. And in that time the only thing that's happened is the wealthy take their tax breaks and hold on to it. They don't create more jobs. They don't pay their workers more. They store it in things like super yachts.

Lowering taxes does not create more economic activity unless they were burdensome to start with. Which is not a problem American rich people and Corporations have.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Either you are answering something else and clicked my post by error, or you haven't paid attention to a single word except for the "lowering taxes" parts.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I’m talking about encouraging people to put in use as much as possible of what they own, which means that making interaction cheaper via lowering some taxes is important to do not only for the “lower income level” people, actually it’s most important for the “rich”. That’s the candy part of encouraging economic activity, and the boot part would be taxing properties (should be done carefully, or, say, large realty companies are going to be less affected than individual owners with only their apartment\house, which would be a complete failure).

This? This is the entirety of the comment, and it is the theory behind the massive tax breaks American politicians keep giving the wealthy. If you mean something else please let me know.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you mean something else please let me know.

Yes, I meant what I wrote.

That you have to encourage circulation and discourage "hoarding", which means that the former should be much more beneficial than the latter. For "the rich" as well.

"Tax breaks" are selective bullshit which shouldn't ever happen.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well then you're just plain wrong. Because we've been lowering taxes on the wealthy for 60 years and they still aren't circulating the money. We even tried giving them money. Just more yachts and stocks.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

See, it won't make a difference if I repeat what I said for the third time. You are just not getting it just as you are not getting economics.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

All the moaning in the world doesn't change history.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago

The actual history - yes, it doesn't. The subjective picture in your head or mine - of course it does. And naturally I prefer my subjective picture, especially since you refused to read its description, arguing with your imagination instead.

Nobody fscking cares what you say to another person when it includes "you think this, and not what you are saying you think", it's nuts.