this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
558 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59118 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
558
Japanese Institute breaks optical fiber speed record with 22.9 petabits per second — 1,000 times faster than existing cables (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 11 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Speedy thing goes in, speedy thing comes out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 66 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For those wanting a bit of a summary.

transmitting up to 22.9 petabits per second (Pb/s) through a single optic cable composed of multiple fibers

The breakthrough isn’t things moving faster but more fibers per cable. So you can transfer more bits in parallel.

That’s still a good breakthrough because, for lots of reasons, packing more fibers in isn’t as straight forward as one would think.

[–] Kazumara@feddit.de 74 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

The breakthrough isn’t things moving faster but more fibers per cable.

No, it's actually more cores per fiber, and using those very well for space division multiplexing on top of the normal wavelength division multiplexing. They are talking about 22.9 Pb/s per fiber, not cable, the Tom's Hardware article is just wrong.

Cables can already contain hundreds of fibers, for example 576 here or into the thousands if you use stacks of ribbon cables in the subunits, for example 3456 here

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 52 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Here's a source that backs up what you're talking about and proving that the TomsHardware article is wrong: https://www.nict.go.jp/en/press/2023/11/30-1.html

[–] Kazumara@feddit.de 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thank you!

[–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Yes, thanks to all for contributing and assisting. I am grateful for the clarification and leg work. Folks say reddit had this, and lemmy has less, so every time I see it, I make sure to appreciate it.

[–] neidu@feddit.nl 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Am I to understand that the cable use has multiple cores within a single cladding? Interesting approach..

Now we get to classify them as singlemode, multimode, and multiestmode.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

This is really interesting. Thank you for providing good insight!