this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
-4 points (47.8% liked)

Privacy

31220 readers
972 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On November 16th, Meredith Whittaker, President of Signal, published a detailed breakdown of the popular encrypted messaging app’s running costs for the very first time. The unprecedented disclosure’s motivation was simple - the platform is rapidly running out of money, and in dire need of donations to stay afloat. Unmentioned by Whittaker, this budget shortfall results in large part due to the US intelligence community, which lavishly financed Signal’s creation and maintenance over several years, severing its support for the app.

Never acknowledged in any serious way by the mainstream media, Signal’s origins as a US government asset are a matter of extensive public record, even if the scope and scale of the funding provided has until now been secret. The app, brainchild of shadowy tech guru ‘Moxie Marlinspike’ (real name Matthew Rosenfeld), was launched in 2013 by his now-defunct Open Whisper Systems (OWS). The company never published financial statements or disclosed the identities of its funders at any point during its operation.

Sums involved in developing, launching and running a messaging app used by countless people globally were nonetheless surely significant. The newly-published financial records indicate Signal’s operating costs for 2023 alone are $40 million, and projected to rise to $50 million by 2025. Rosenfeld boasted in 2018 that OWS “never [took] VC funding or sought investment” at any point, although mysteriously failed to mention millions were provided by Open Technology Fund (OTF).

OTF was launched in 2012 as a pilot program of Radio Free Asia (RFA), an asset of US Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which is funded by US Congress to the tune of over $1 billion annually. In August 2018, its then-CEO openly acknowledged the Agency’s “global priorities…reflect US national security and public diplomacy interests.”

[Article continues...]

Archive links:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago (6 children)

US government: "Make us an app that people can use to subvert suppressive regimes."

Developer: *makes Signal*

US Citizens: "Hey, that's a useful app.." *installs*

US Government: "No, not like that!"

[–] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

US government: “Make us an app that people can use so we are the only ones accessing their meta-data.” Developer: makes Signal US Government: 👍

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)
[–] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Bruce Schneier is also probably just a conspiracy theorist, when he writes in 2014:

"By the way, the Register noted that Whisper Systems (along with Tor and several other privacy projects) received $450,000 from Radio Free Asia – which is pretty much an official State Department / CIA propaganda organ, isn’t it? How exactly does this work as a coherent national security strategy, when State is funding ‘privacy’ while NSA is funding eavesdropping? https://www.opentechfund.org/sites/default/files/attachments/otf2013annualreportfinal.pdf"

https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/11/whatsapp_is_now.html

oh and that linked annual report of the OTF, like the following ones, doesn't seem to be online anymore... :))

what a joke

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

You're right! I don't know either.

The facts remain, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)