this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
710 points (96.5% liked)

politics

18935 readers
3704 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TheGuardian.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today -2 points 9 months ago

I dunno what kind of math games theyre playing with this “mass killing” definition lately

If they didn't broaden the definition they wouldn't be able to include knife attacks in their article.

They aren't attempting to hide the level of Gun Violence, they're trying to get clicks by re-spinning the data.

Here is a good source I frequent to get a better idea of whats happening day to day.

GVA is decent but a lot of people don't look past the number totals to try and understand the problem(s). The majority of the incidents recorded there look a lot like this one.

The salient details are depressingly familiar

  1. Very Late at Night / Early in the Morning
  2. Socioeconomically disadvantaged participants
  3. Alcohol / Drugs involved
  4. Illegally possessed Firearms

You can just walk down the list of incidents and pick them out over and over and over.

https://abc30.com/central-fresno-deadly-shooting-two-men-killed-apartment-party/14141254/

https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/4-shot-house-party-over-100-minors-suspect-arrested-aurora/

https://myfox8.com/news/north-carolina/winston-salem/winston-salem-woman-arrested-charged-after-multiple-people-shot-at-spott-bar-and-lounge-police-say/