Programming

13376 readers

1 users here now

All things programming and coding related. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

Hexorg@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

any good github copilot alternatives? (quex.cc)

submitted 1 year ago by fuser@quex.cc to c/programming@beehaw.org

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Copilot is great, but a hundred bucks for what is basically a smart autocomplete seems a bit much - mostly, I hate the fact that the code is constantly transmitted to github (my repos are mostly local) - are there any reasonably convenient options for doing this without github looking over my shoulder all the time? I'm using VSCode but not wedded to it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fairly skeptical about Jetbrains' Model, so it's basically a wait and see.

[–] fuser@quex.cc 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

from the FAQ:

How much will AI Assistant cost in JetBrains IDEs? The AI assistant is currently free to use during the preview phase. We’ll be providing the licensing and pricing model at a later date.

It looks as though it would be similar to github - they host the model and you pay a subscription for real time access while you're coding.

Still, I'd feel ideologically more at peace paying Jetbrains for IDE-as-a-service than I do slinging github a hundred smackers just to use their model from somebody else's IDE.

A public / open source solution would be ideal.

[–] TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know, just not sure the quality it offers and I am 99% sure that they train it on the piles which is a huge nearly 1 petabyte dataset that includes GitHub code. They are likely doing the same thing GitHub did when training copilot.