this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
134 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
859 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From the article: “In some ways, the current situation has spurred an arms race. YouTube has inadvertently improved ad blockers, as the new knowledge and techniques gained from innovating within the YouTube platform are also applicable to other ad and tracking systems.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I think this will only end up with YouTube winning. Google has been caution for years, but they can bring the big guns if they see there are no more options. Google is clearly desperate to bring those numbers up and they don't care if user experience suffers.

First, they can decide to deploy a restrictive CSP that prevents external scripts from running in the page. This would break lots of extension that work on YouTube.

And then they can just enforce DRM like Netflix. This will be horrible for users, cost them more to serve, and potentially break Youtube for older clients. But then ads will be impossible to skip, and downloading videos will because almost impossible.

But if they decide the numbers are worth it, they will do it. But honestly at this point I really don't care. Will I miss YouTube? Sure. But I rather watch less content on nebula than support this horrible user experience.

[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 13 points 11 months ago

Enforcing DRM has a big downside: it paints a massive target on the DRM implementation, and it will likely end up getting broken.

[–] Pechente@feddit.de 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I rather watch less content on nebula than support this horrible user experience.

At this point the majority of channels that I like are on Nebula. You’re right, it won’t be a huge loss.

[–] Crotaro@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago

Indeed. It could be a huge win for Nebula, in fact. At least I hope if the users on YouTube lose that a different platform wins and it won't just be a net loss for users and YT-competitors.

[–] bl4kers@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nebula is a walled garden though. They don't even have a formal process for applying to be on it. I hear it's invite only basically

[–] Pechente@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that is unfortunate. They will probably never fully replace Youtube until they change drastically. They also serve a niche of interests only. It happens to align with my interests really well but it's definitely not for everyone.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't think they really have a goal of replacing youtube. I think the end goal is becoming an old school style media production organization, one that is collectively owned and bridges the Gap between social media and Hollywood.

[–] marius851000@lemmy.mariusdavid.fr 8 points 11 months ago

Well, I'm not that pessimist, at least not on those 2 points. I hardly see how CSP would prevent addon to do their stuff, as CSP is protection against cross site attacks, and extension aren't sites (thought I actually remember having an issue like that once making an extension, but correcting the extensio's permissions solved it).

And DRMs only apply on the video stream. It won't protect the webpage or the javascript. Plus there are content on youtube that they are contractually required to not put behind DRMs.

What I'm worried youtube will do is simply that their server will refuse to send the video until a certain time after the user load the page, thid time corresponding to a bit less than the time the user would wait by playing ads.

It won't force the user to watch ads. But it'll deincensitive it by a certain amount.