this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
2175 points (96.7% liked)

Lemmy

12432 readers
6 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please. Captcha by default. Email domain filters. Auto-block federation from servers that don't respect. By default. Urgent.

meme not so funny

And yes, to refute some comments, this publication is being upvoted by bots. A single computer was needed, not "thousands of dollars" spent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] le__el@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actually, hello.1@gmail will go to hello1@gmail.

The one you are thinking I believe is hello+1@gmail will go to hello@gmail

[–] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Correct, Gmail essentially doesn't "see" dots hello@gmail is the same as h.e.l.l.o@gmail

hello+anything@gmail will also be delivered to hello@gmail. This is great for signing up for mailing lists or subscriptions then creating a filter afterwards to do with it what you please.

[–] tool@r.rosettast0ned.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Correct, Gmail essentially doesn’t “see” dots hello@gmail is the same as h.e.l.l.o@gmail

There's one exception to that. If you originally created the email address with a dot in it, as in, signed up for gmail as "hello.2@gmail.com," it's treated as a literal character in the username portion and is required.

[–] fart@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

maybe in the past, but i did that a few years ago and switch between the dot and not

[–] tool@r.rosettast0ned.com 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it had to have changed at some point then. It used to be required that you use the dot if you registered it with the dot.

[–] reduce@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago

It’s still not required in this case…

[–] PlasmaK@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

This particular quirk can be easily accounted for tbqh.

[–] gkd@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Ahh, yea that's right. Regardless, just all the more reason that it's kind of silly to do what OP is talking about. Sure, you could filter out the + signs as well but overall it's a pretty pointless implementation.