this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
111 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22086 readers
187 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] salarua@sopuli.xyz 37 points 1 year ago (5 children)

i'm just glad this whole thing is over. what a sick world we live in where five billionaires in a submarine sparks wall to wall coverage and five hundred migrants gets barely a passing mention

[–] maximus@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think it's more how uncommon the situation is, the complexity and odds of the rescue, and the 'ticking clock' effect that came from them only having 96 hours of oxygen. Stories need to be interesting to get mass media coverage (look at the Tham Luang cave rescue - none of them were billionares), and, as incredibly bleak as this sentence sounds, a boat capsizing with hundreds onboard just isn't interesting enough.

[–] RedCanasta@lemmy.fmhy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Yea it's totally not that every major news outlet is owned by and serves the interests of the rich.

[–] walkingears@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's also a sort of morbid fascination and curiosity that comes from a situation this unique. I definitely agree that of course the sinking refugee ship should have gotten far more help and attention, but I think the "morbid curiosity" element is certainly part of why this got so much attention. The whole situation of paying a fortune for visiting the Titanic in a janky unregulated submersible and then vanishing underwater is...bizarre, and surreal, in a way that captures attention

[–] nfld0001@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I still can’t get over how janky that tin can felt to me when I was looking into it. Not even getting into the safety cuts, the whole picture felt cheap. The Poop-Bucket a foot away and audibly masked with turning up the music; five people sitting cross-cross applesauce on basically an exercise mat in cramped real estate; working with two desktop monitors and a Logitech controller; the CEO explicitly bragging about cutting corners and breaking rules.

I think that even if the sub more closely resembled expectations and even if the CEO was on top of safety, the story would’ve still been a quick sell on mass media. A sub exploring the Titanic going missing invokes the kind of visuals and what-ifs that start to depart reality and arrive to movie territory. Add the schadenfreude to it and the minivan as described above and that movie becomes a sort of dark humor comedy blended with horror.

I think that this story makes for a good sideshow to gawk at. It’s also a good vehicle to laugh at the rich. The shipwreck in the Mediterranean, as much as it demands our attention in contrast, is much more grounded in reality—hard and painful realities—that I think a sizable chunk of society gets squeamish about. It demands we answer questions and take actions that certain someones would rather we don’t.

[–] dope@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Interesting enough to get a gaggle of billionaires in a bolted metal box and explore the capsized boat. 🤨

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Agree, I don't think much of the coverage at all had to do with "Oh no, look at the poor rich people in trouble!" And had a lot more to do with the potential for a Hollywood style life-saving mission.

[–] maximus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Not to say that that idea itself isn't saddening

[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In my country, they started the newscast 2h earlier than usual just to say "Debris were found; may be unrelated". I think they initially went live earlier because the conference was meant to happen earlier and they couldn't wait to show it; it had to be live. When it got postponed, they spent 2h just talking about it with commentators and different specialists; all just theorizing what could have happened, and whether there might still be a chance for rescue or not, and repeating that there would be a conference "so stay tuned!".

But refugees you barely hear about.

I get this story has some more "thrill" and novelty to it, being a submarine near the titanic and all, but this really is ridiculous.

[–] Thrashy@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The more prosaic explanation -- bordering on "banality of evil," but still -- is that a story about a rickety overloaded fishing boat full of desperate war refugees sinking in the Mediterranean has become a fairly common occurrence in the years since the Arab Spring turned into a decade of civil wars, but whiz-bang private subs going missing while diving on the most famous shipwreck of all time is unusual. Horses vs. zebras and all that.

[–] AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Yup. Also why do people want more media attention on this. It's not going to stop the human traffickers from overloading their boats. It's not that no one did anything. The coast guards and navies of multiple countries acted as soon as they became aware the boat sank and as a result saved a ton of people. Would people really be happier if we had end to end coverage of a disaster that had no mystery to it just an all too common occurrence of lives being lost fleeing Africa and the Middle East dangerously.

[–] Dandylion@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

4 billionaires and one guys 19 year old kid.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Definitely shows where the media's priorities lie, ie the wealthy lamenting the loss of their own

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Were all of them billionaires? I can't imagine the people actually operating the thing were, surely, just the passengers?

[–] Fauxreigner@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The pilot may not have been, although anyone described as an "explorer" is pretty likely to be wealthy. Three of the other four (including the CEO) were, and the last was one of the billionaire's 19 year old son.

Edit: Checked, the pilot (Paul-Henri Nargeolet) was also a billionaire.

[–] acupofcoffee@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

The CEO was the pilot.

[–] salarua@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it was literally just the five of them

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe we should send another 150 or so subs, also filled with 5 billionaires each.