this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
54 points (98.2% liked)

World News

39005 readers
1560 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] beigegull@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

What's your basis for making those factual claims about the future behavior of complex systems?

[–] Pmmeyourtoaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I mean, not that complex after a point. Shit's getting hotter and more intense and it's the result of human activity. We can either change the activity or accept that it'll continue to get hotter and more intense.

[–] beigegull@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

How much hotter? What concrete harms will result? How much can that be reduced by different levels of reduction in fossil fuel use? What are the harms from that reduction? How do those harms compare? What are the second order effects and their consequences for all of the above?

Now, let's step back and accept that nobody actually has reliable answers to most of those questions. Further, nobody actually gets to make global policy choices. Even worse, the people who do make national policy choices don't seem to make those choices based on collecting the best data and then rationally trying to serve the public interest.

Nether the "humanity will die" and "climate change isn't real" claims are honest attempts to accurately predict the future. They are strategic attempts to influence public perception in a way that is hoped to lead to specific kinds of policy choice that benefit coalitions of special interests at the expense of most of humanity. Most people would be significantly better off if neither of those buckets of policies were implemented.

[–] shiftymccool@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We can't "prove" or accurately predict anything so l let's just keep shitting where we eat. Solid logic

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)