this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
257 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22058 readers
63 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GeenVliegtuig@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I know at least one person that has preemptively rejected cultivated meat because it requires the death of an animal.

Even though they know that a single animal's death could then spare uncountable billions of future animals.

... does that make the chicken sampled for cultivation Chicken Jesus?

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're going to start rejecting things because even one animal died in the process of making them, you'd have to say goodbye to much of modern medicine too.

[–] HipHoboHarold@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would argue at some point they would need to reject modern living as a whole. Go build an A frame in the woods. Forage for berries and shit. Many aspects of the ways we live cause deaths. Like cars hitting animals. So if a single animal is too much, I have a feeling they should really be following that mindset.

[–] chatterbox@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The amount of animals killed by a modern farm tractor combine passing through is enormous. Its just that we don't count "vermin" like that life. And most people who are vegan will never see it.

[–] leetnewb@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think that cultivated meat technically requires the death of an animal at all.