this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
918 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

59311 readers
6242 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

IBM, a major advertiser on X, has pulled its spending from the social media platform, whose employees are grappling with what to tell its other advertisers, according to internal messages.

To be clear: Musk endorsed a tweet which used a false antisemitic conspiracy theory to tell people why "Hitler was right"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alwaysfallingupyup@lemmings.world 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

By the 1930s, the new Nazi government needed that technology — and recruited IBM for the job. Tabulating machines made tracking lines of Jewish descent possible, even if a German citizen’s family had married out of the religion or converted generations ago.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 23 points 1 year ago

90 years ago. Musk is giving a platform to Nazi and endorsing them right now.

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What spirit are you posting that comment in (liquor notwithstanding)?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the implication is that IBM was happy to work with Nazis to implement the holocaust, but working with X is a bridge too far. Thus by that logic, Musk is worse than Hitler.

[–] S_204@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or..... they've learned from their past and don't want to be associated with Antisemitism anymore?

[–] farngis_mcgiles@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

theyve decide its not profitable for now lol companies that big dont let silly thing like morality color their decisions

[–] User_4272894@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder who makes the mainframes used at NSA domestic spying server farms, or who run the computing for predator drone targeting systems. "Not profitable to be vocal in support of antisemitism" hardly means "currently on the moral high ground"...

Point taken. One form of dissent is definitely safer

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

Of course they did, it's all in jest.

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

You've used that word 'implication' a few times now...

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It sounds like you think IBM has the same employees from 90 years ago...

Is your point that they should be consistent in their historical anti-Semitism? What exactly do you expect them to do other than disavow their past transgressions?

If anything companies like IBM, Hugo Boss and Volkswagen should be extra vigilant about supporting Nazis because of their past.

Your ancestors probably did some fucked up shit too. They may have own slaves. Are you arguing that you should be defending slavery since your ancestors engaged in it?

Think dude

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What exactly do you expect them to do other than disavow their past transgressions?

Compensations and restorations would be a minimally decent start.

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then we are going to need reparations from you for your ancestors role in slavery

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

implying I'm from the US

good try, asshat.

Is this supposed to be some kind kind of gotcha? It's just a related fact, with no opinion, or narrative, or near as I can tell, point