this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
868 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

34793 readers
344 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Solar now being the cheapest energy source made its rounds on Lemmy some weeks ago, if I remember correctly. I just found this graphic and felt it was worth sharing independently.

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/cheap-renewables-growth

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 8 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I want a battery in my house big enough for me to lose power for 2 days and still cook with electric stove and have hot water from water heater.

That is my dream for every house. To be able to have a stable power well from some kind of battery fed by a solar + grid sharing. To be able to offer extra power to a neighbor if they need it for a project or a party or help however.

I don't want to be energy isolated from the grid. I want to be energy insulated and be of the grid.

[–] knatsch@feddit.de -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hydrogen is the answer for that, cost about 100k today hopefully those cost will decline fast

https://www.homepowersolutions.de/produkt/

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

The problem with Hydrogen, is that its not efficient (fuel cells apparently are only 40-60% efficient). In contrast, batteries are 90% or more efficient (and improving)

So, you'd be wasting 50% of the power generated, and wasting fresh water too.. Thats all assuming too that the additional minerals in the water won't cause extra issues either.

Battery costs keep dropping, and the technology keeps improving rapidly.

If they can get the efficiency much higher, maybe.. It also might make sense for long range cars (at the moment) due to energy density

But, in practice, companies like BP and traditional gas companies are the main ones who benefit from a hydrogen economy. Because they can use non-renewable to undercut everyone

load more comments (3 replies)