this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
84 points (95.7% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] federalreverse@feddit.de 24 points 11 months ago

I say that because:

  • Eating plants directly is always going to be more efficient than eating lab grown meat which was fed on plants (because there are going to be waste products).
  • Eating plants directly is also healthier. Cancers, heart attacks, blood pressure issues... some very common health issues partly stem from humans in industrialized nations eating way too many animal products. Lab grown meat won't magically be healthier.
  • There's still a chance that lab-grown meat doesn't pan out because it's hard to scale up.
  • Lab grown meat is going to be high-tech for a while. This gives a lot of power to a few select companies. Lab-meat shoppers are going to be dependent on a few startups and eventually a few multinationals which have bought up the startups.
  • This also means prices are going to be dictated by this oligopoly of companies, most of which need to serve investors. Often that's going to be tech investors who expect a lot of growth leading to a lot of profit.