this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
63 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17920 readers
28 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Gaywallet@beehaw.org
alyaza@beehaw.org
63
The Lack of Compensation in Open Source Software is Unsustainable (trstringer.com)
submitted 11 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/foss@beehaw.org
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's why I like the GPL. I'm fine with people using my software for personal use, or for commercial use if that's integrated in another open source software.

If a company want to use my software with an unrestrictive opensource license, we're going to have to discuss license price.

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

GPL code can be used in proprietary products as long as it is not distributed outside. There are a lot of such use cases.

[–] wiki_me@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

At this point i think everybody should just use the AGPL instead of the GPL.

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

There was an instance where Google used a GPL software (GNU units?) in their backend and didn't release the modifications because they were technically not distributing it. So yes. It supports your suggestion of using AGPL where its purpose is not immediately apparent. It's a good thing that people are starting to accept copyleft licenses after the anti-copyleft tirade promoted by the industry.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Seconded, AGPL may be better especially in cases where software is network related.